Water Authority Drifts a Radical Idea in Strange Public Survey

The San Diego County Water Authority is drifting an extreme idea to upend how 19 million Southern Californians get their water.
The company paid for a poll last month that asked citizens whether they would support the state taking control of water products throughout the region, including much of the water used in San Diego.
The $31,000 poll is part of an aggressive $220,000 project the Water Authority is waging against another public water firm, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
The Water Authority is a member of Metropolitan’s board and its biggest client, but the two firms have actually long been at odds. Water Authority officials blame Metropolitan for failing to get ready for a drought in the early-1990s and screwing San Diego then and now.
The majority of the poll’s 62 questions were created to evaluate different messages that might turn voters against Metropolitan, a tactic typical of political ballot. That alone is odd. One public company does not generally poll to determine how to damage another public company’s credibility.
Beyond that, one concern in the poll drifted a policy shift that would impact the water system of almost everybody in California south of Bakersfield.

Assist United States Raise $100k By the End of May

The poll asked whether “The state needs to action in and purchase water for our area till the MWD [Metropolitan] can fix its fiscal mismanagement.”
For the Water Authority to make such a suggest is unusual: For the past two years, the agency has been slamming Gov. Jerry Brown’s administration for aiming to micromanage regional water firms during the dry spell. Now, it suggests some kind of state control is the way to go.
Metropolitan is frequently viewed as distinct force acting on behalf of Southern California, consisting of San Diego, in the limitless power struggles over water in this state. If the state were suddenly in charge, it’s possible other political interests– like Northern California ecologists or effective cliques of Central Valley farmers– could use their impact in Sacramento to gain more control.
During a board conference last week, a few Water Authority board members wondered about the poll, which a number of them had not seen prior to.
Water Authority assistant general manager Dennis Cushman told everyone not to take the question about state control too seriously.
” They do not represent particular propositions that we’re advising pursuing,” Cushman stated.
Gary Arant, a member of the Water Authority’s board who was not involved in crafting the poll questions, told Cushman that even drifting such ideas threatened.
” I’m simply worried sometimes these concepts take life and the next thing you understand …” he said.
Arant stated he stressed the state may choose to take control not only of Metropolitan but also of the Water Authority. The Water Authority has a governance structure almost similar to Metropolitan’s.
Metropolitan collects water from Northern California and the Colorado River and resells it to other water agencies throughout Southern California, consisting of the Water Authority. The Water Authority purchases this water then resells it within San Diego to regional companies, like the city of San Diego’s water department.
The Water Authority remains in the midst of a significant lawsuit versus Metropolitan, accusing it of loading inappropriate charges on San Diegans.
The Water Authority has adopted more uncommon techniques of aiming to challenge Metropolitan, consisting of a ratepayer-funded site called MWD Truths that slams Metropolitan’s decision-making. The information is often ostensibly accurate– it typically originates from Metropolitan’s own documents– however exists in a slanted or incomplete method.
The Water Authority just recently launched a new “Stop the Costs!” project.
The recent poll tested out several different attacks the Water Authority has actually been using. Among its primary accusations is that Metropolitan has actually been wantonly investing numerous millions of dollars on grass rebates and on land in the Sacramento– San Joaquin River Delta.
Metropolitan safeguards the turf rebates as a way to conserve water, and the land purchases as a way to prepare for the governor’s Twin Tunnels task, which has actually not yet been approved.
The Water Authority likewise implicates Metropolitan of gathering numerous millions of dollars in extra revenue by ignoring what does it cost? water it will offer each year. Metropolitan authorities state they have actually had trouble forecasting how much water they will offer because of variability in environment and weather patterns.
In the poll, the Water Authority also asked if citizens would support legislation banning these “overcharges” or if they would support getting rid of the basic supervisor and board officers at Metropolitan.
Right now, Metropolitan’s board picks its own officers– chair, vice chairs, secretary– and the board likewise picks the general supervisor of Metropolitan. The Water Authority has one of the biggest blocs of votes at Metropolitan, but nowhere near a bulk. Undoubtedly, due to the fact that of the battles it selects, the Water Authority frequently does not have many allies on the board. None of its agents are officers.
A bulk of people surveyed supported those procedures, however it’s unclear if they really understand the problems. At the start of the poll, 57 percent of the people surveyed said they understood little or absolutely nothing about Metropolitan.
The Water Authority’s outside experts promoted the fact that after giving voters more information about Metropolitan during the poll, individuals were likely to think adversely of Metropolitan.
Mark Muir, chairman of the Water Authority’s board, safeguarded the poll during a board conference last week. He stated it was an useful public opinion survey, not a “push survey,” which is the term for a political cheat. The goal of a push poll is to spread out unfavorable messages about someone or something under the guise of public viewpoint research.
Metropolitan wasn’t buying it.
” San Diego’s survey is a push poll designed to get outcomes the County Water Authority desires and it’s an unfortunate waste of ratepayer loan,” said Bob Muir, Metropolitan’s spokesman.
It’s not uncommon for the Water Authority to poll individuals about their mindsets towards water service. However those polls are typically of clients in San Diego. The current poll was unusual since it surveyed people throughout Southern California– outside of the Water Authority’s service area– and only consisted of signed up citizens.
A person does not have to be a registered voter to use water, so it’s possible the results of the survey don’t really represent the sentiments of the general population– about a quarter of Californians are not signed up to vote.
Mike Lee, a representative for the Water Authority, stated the choice to sample just citizens was “to guarantee a fundamental level of civic engagement by participants.”
This article connects to: Politics, Water

Partner Voices

What We Learned This Week

About a year earlier, Andrew Sharp, the chief spokesman for the San Diego Unified School District, made a joke– two times– about VOSD press reporter Ashly McGlone turning up dead.
At the time, Scott Lewis and I composed that joke or not, we took it seriously.
I’ve been thinking of those “jokes” a lot today, as we saw a GOP candidate for Congress attack a reporter who asked a routine health care concern on the final day of the project.
That prospect had a history of making jokes about violence against reporters.
” We ‘d explain that all the other doubtful interactions Gianforte had with reporters, consisting of one case where he joked about joining forces against a reporter, should now be seen through a much more sinister lens,” the Billings Gazette editorial board wrote in a piece rescinding its endorsement of Greg Gianforte. “What he passed off as a joke at the time now ends up being much more serious.”
When Rep. Duncan Hunter, who represents eastern San Diego County, was asked whether Gianforte’s behavior was appropriate, he said this: “Of course not. It’s not appropriate behavior. Unless the press reporter deserved it.”

Help Us Raise $100k By the End of Might

Hunter has himself been the subject of aggressive watchdog reporting by the Union-Tribune that helped start a federal examination into Hunter’s use of campaign funds.
At the San Diego County Taxpayers Association supper this week (where, fittingly, McGlone’s dogged reporting on the school district was recognized), one of the chairs of the occasion remarked on how San Diego was unique because its leaders were able to disagree on policy but still come together for a night of laughs.
However how different are we actually?
If any San Diego leaders have actually forcefully condemned Hunter’s horrible and unsafe remark, I have not become aware of it.
Meanwhile, Sharp remains employed as the chief public information officer for an agency charged with educating San Diego’s children.
What VOSD Learned Today
Each piece of Mario Koran’s thorough examination of how San Diego Unified attained its unprecedented graduation rate is not to be missed. The district states it attained its grad rate thanks to a big boost from online courses. Now, we’re speaking with instructors and trainees throughout the district that cheating in those courses is frequent and pervasive.
Then there’s the school budget and its multimillion-dollar shortfall. If a group of well-resourced parents and even a school board member can’t get information, what hope does everybody else have?
♦ ♦ ♦.
Some news on the basics: water, food and shelter:.
It’s not simply your imagination: You actually are paying some of the highest water rates in the nation.
Some regional companies state they will get screwed by a brand-new city policy controling who can gather food waste from restaurants.
And San Diego leaders state they’re aiming to lastly go from a lot of piecemeal prepares to end homelessness to one combined approach, but they admit it won’t be simple.
♦ ♦ ♦.
This week, Maya Srikrishnan profiled Mary Salas, among the very first Latina mayors in the county, and found that despite improving transit and development projects, she’s still having a hard time to acquire traction with SANDAG.
And I spoke with California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, the first Latino to hold that role. We talked about San Diego’s election reforms, the $450 million voter modernization bond he’s wishing to pass and why he’s so outspoken about concerns that surpass his job title.
Padilla is amongst a group of state leaders who have actually been vocal in pushing back against President Donald Trump’s policies. Part of that effort consists of SB 54, the so-called sanctuary state bill. Scott Lewis zeroed in this week on how the bill would impact San Diego, particularly ICE’s representatives who work inside San Diego jails.
What I read.
– A great deal of criminal justice reporting over the last couple of years has zeroed in on false confessions. This sensational story takes a look at an associated problem: children who were manipulated into making false allegations against their father. (Marshall Job).
– How Maggie Haberman ended up being a Trump whisperer and perhaps the most influential political press reporter in the country. (Elle).
– On the heels of Mario Koran’s jaw-dropping story about unfaithful in online healing courses comes this deep dive into similar problems in Florida and beyond. (Slate).
– President Donald Trump in fact used to be pretty articulate. This interesting story takes a look at possible reasons that altered. (Stat).
– Now, they’re Backstreet Guys. (MEL).
– Some businesses require job applicants to take employment tests as part of the working with procedure, and– surprise!– they provide white, male candidates a substantial boost. (Reveal).
Line of the Week.
” When we’re scared, as many of us are today, it’s simple to close down– to hold our girls especially better, to try to secure them by keeping their lives a little more restricted, by making them a little less free. Do not. Take them to their favorite show instead.”– From a lovely piece in the wake of the Manchester bombing about what occurs when we dismiss teenage girls.
This short article associates with: News, What We Learned Today.

Written by Sara Libby.
Sara Libby is VOSD’s handling editor. She oversees VOSD’s newsroom and its content. You can reach her at sara.libby@voiceofsandiego.org or 619.325.0526.

Partner Voices.

Leading Stories: May 20-May 26

These were the most popular Voice of San Diego stories for the week of May 20-May 26.
1. The California Legislature Is About to Kick Migration Agents From San Diego JailsSB 54, the so-called sanctuary state expense, would be the most considerable modification to regional immigration enforcement in a years– and it would come not from President Donald Trump but the state. (Scott Lewis).
2. Frustrated San Diego Unified Parents Say They Cannot Get the answer to Basic School Budget plan QuestionsA group of well-resourced parents at Gage Elementary, as well as the school board member who represents them, say they have actually struck a brick wall when it pertains to getting the answer from San Diego Unified about school budget cuts. If they can’t get standard details, one moms and dad stated, “Exactly what possibility does the rest of this district have?” (Mario Koran).
3. It Is Shockingly Easy to Cheat San Diego Unified’s Online CoursesAcross the district, online courses are making it possible for countless students to get caught up on classes they formerly stopped working. However students also have access to the web as they take tests and tests, making it possible to discover answers to the specific questions that appear on tests. (Mario Koran).
4. San Diego Wishes to Go From Cacophony to One Voice on HomelessnessSan Diego’s homeless-serving method has long suffered from a lack of coordination. Regional leaders now wish to get everyone to follow a single strategy. (Lisa Halverstadt).
5. North County Report: Vista Aims to Corral Issa ProtestersOceanside faces big problems in the lack of its mayor, The Coast News is still looking for an editor and more in our weekly roundup of news from North County. (Ruarri Serpa).

Help United States Raise $100k By the End of May.

6. Lincoln High Parents Exasperated as Hunt for a Principal Drags OnSan Diego Unified School District revealed it was going to keep looking for a brand-new principal for the school that has long faced management turmoil. (Mario Koran).
7. Voice of San Diego to Spin Off New Organization to Support Great Journalism EverywhereSeveral months earlier, Voice of San Diego released the News Earnings Center, a project to help news organizations contract out the management of their subscription programs. Now the Hub will become its own company, led by Voice of San Diego Publisher/COO Mary Walter-Brown and Digital Supervisor Tristan Loper. (Scott Lewis).
8. Why Big Winter season Rains Have not Done Much to Fill San Diego ReservoirsWhen it rains big in San Diego, people always wonder why we can’t capture it. We do capture a lot of it, but it’s the first we decide to utilize since it’s the least expensive. (Ry Rivard).
9. The City and Small companies Are Fighting Over Table ScrapsA handful of unlicensed small businesses that gather food waste from regional restaurants will lose all their clients in the city of San Diego at the end of June under a new city policy. (Kinsee Morlan).
10. This Mayor Boosts Real estate, Highway and Transit Projects But Still Takes a Rear seat at SANDAGChula Vista Mayor Mary Salas backed SANDAG’s Step A, effectively lobbied for a tax boost in Chula Vista to money facilities upgrades and boosts housing advancements in the South Bay and beyond. But both she and Chula Vista still struggle to get a seat at the table when it concerns SANDAG and the jobs it oversees. (Maya Srikrishnan).
This post connects to: News, Top Stories.

Partner Voices.

Morning Report: Educators, Students Open Up About Widespread Online Unfaithful

Last week, Mario Koran sat in on the sort of online class that San Diego Unified significantly relies on to boost its graduation rate.
He saw as students brazenly cheated– taking responses from sites where other trainees had actually currently submitted tests and tests, muting lectures so they might view Netflix, entering mumbo jumbo into short answer action fields and getting full credit. Trainees and teachers stated the habits is widespread in the online classes.
In response, the San Diego Unified School District told the Union Tribune today that Koran’s experience was simply anecdotal.
Well, the anecdotes are accumulating.
In a brand-new story, Koran assembled much more trainees and instructors from around the district who came forward to tell the exact same story. Unfaithful is widespread, and lots of kids do not believe they’re learning anything in these classes, as Koran wrote in a follow-up.
A just recently retired Morse High teacher stated, “it’s worse than you believe.” A Hoover trainee stated the courses kept him from not graduating, but didn’t teach him anything. Educators at Patrick Henry High described in an email obtained by Koran that unfaithful was rampant and tough to stop. A teacher at a school that teaches standard life skills to kids with disabilities said that school now gets less students, given that they can just rely on online courses to obtain a diploma.

Help United States Raise $100k By the End of May

” We as a district are not preparing trainees for the real world by supplying ‘phony’ diplomas,” the instructor, Stacy Williams, stated.
– inewsource has actually been examining widespread grade inflation at Gompers, a charter school in southeastern San Diego that’s been praised for several years as a model for schools in the location. In the latest installment, a former teacher of the year at the school stated the discoveries about the school’s practices– lots of teachers stated they were freely informed they needed to change kids’ grades– ought to be a springboard for difficult discussions in between the community and school leaders.
Sacramento Report: Padilla Applauds San Diego’s Election Reforms
San Diegans in November passed 2 procedures that might overthrow city elections. Races now should be chosen in November general elections, and not June primaries. The change suggests races will be finalized when turnout is greatest– and it’s a benefit to Democrats, who fare better when more individuals vote. Assemblyman Todd Gloria is pushing for a similar modification with countywide elections.
California’s Secretary of State Alex Padilla remained in town this week, and told Sara Libby it makes our democracy more representative to make choices when more people vote. They also talked about his strategy to invest cash to update the state’s election equipment, and President Donald Trump’s claims about election fraud in California.
This week’s dispatch from the Capitol likewise includes the big price that came out for single-payer health care in California, state-assisted efforts to suppress homelessness and the regional impacts of the so-called sanctuary state costs.
How San Diego’s Legislators Fared in a Huge Week for State Legislation
It was a make-or-break week for many costs in the state Legislature, considering that the Assembly and Senate appropriations committees both gave the greenlight to– or killed off– numerous bills.
Some notable costs from San Diego legislators advanced today, consisting of:
– Sen. Toni Atkins’ costs to fund budget-friendly housing tasks
– Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher’s expense to reform the SANDAG board
– Assemblyman Todd Gloria’s costs to allow housing authorities to establish mixed-income projects
– a costs promoted by San Diego Neighborhood College District Chancellor Constance Carroll that would broaden neighborhood colleges’ capability to provide four-year bachelor’s degrees
— Sara Libby
VOSD Podcast: The New City Lawyer Is a Significant Player
City Attorney Mara Elliott spent most of her project promising to soothe the city lawyer’s office. She said it must be more like the county’s legal counsel: quiet and deferential.
She hasn’t been in the office long, however Elliott hasn’t avoided improving a lot of the city’s greatest policy debates.
On the podcast this week, Scott Lewis and I talked about the city’s newest heavy player, whose legal memo on SoccerCity made things much harder for the designers aiming to remake Objective Valley around a new soccer arena.
Outgoing Port Commissioner Bob Nelson likewise signed up with the program to discuss why he resigned early, and exactly what he sees ahead for strategies to broaden the Convention Center.
Option Energy Comes to Town
Gradually but progressively, more cities across California are pursuing neighborhood choice aggregation, a wonky term that basically implies the city, instead of an utility company like SDG&E, purchases energy for its locals. Supporters expect cities that adopt the modification would switch to renewable resource sources faster than energies are right now.
Solana Beach just ended up being the very first city in the county to move on with the plan, as Claire Trageser reports for KPBS.
Other cities in the county are thinking about the concept as well, including the city of San Diego. Our Ry Rivard wrote an explainer a couple of months ago detailing how the programs work and the difficulties they’re facing.
– An executive for Sempra Energy surprised a space filled with fellow energy executives this week when he announced that there’s no technical reason California couldn’t get all its energy from eco-friendly sources today. (inewsource).
News Around Town.
– San Diego is aiming to loosen the guidelines and costs to construct extra housing units on a single-family lot, called granny flats. The city’s strategy passed the Preparation Commission Friday. (U-T).
– A marsh near Objective Bay might be essential to the city’s battle versus sea-level increase. (U-T).
– UC San Diego scientists found evidence that Volkswagon isn’t really the only major vehicle producer that’s gaming emissions guidelines. (KPBS).
The Week’s Top Stories.
These were the 5 most popular Voice of San Diego stories for the week of May 20-May 26. Click on this link to see the complete leading 10.
1. The California Legislature Will Kick Migration Agents From San Diego JailsSB 54, the so-called sanctuary state bill, would be the most significant modification to regional immigration enforcement in a years– and it would come not from President Donald Trump but the state. (Scott Lewis).
2. Disappointed San Diego Unified Parents State They Can’t Get Answers to Basic School Budget QuestionsA group of well-resourced parents at Gage Elementary, and even the school board member who represents them, say they’ve hit a brick wall when it pertains to getting answers from San Diego Unified about school spending plan cuts. If they can’t get standard information, one moms and dad stated, “What opportunity does the rest of this district have?” (Mario Koran).
3. It Is Shockingly Easy to Cheat San Diego Unified’s Online CoursesAcross the district, online courses are enabling countless students to get captured up on classes they formerly failed. But students likewise have access to the web as they take quizzes and tests, making it possible to discover answers to the precise concerns that appear on tests. (Mario Koran).
4. San Diego Wants to Go From Cacophony to One Voice on HomelessnessSan Diego’s homeless-serving method has long struggled with an absence of coordination. Regional leaders now hope to get everybody to follow a single plan. (Lisa Halverstadt).
5. North County Report: Vista Attempts to Corral Issa ProtestersOceanside deals with huge issues in the absence of its mayor, The Coast News is still searching for an editor and more in our weekly roundup of news from North County.( Ruarri Serpa).
This post associates with: Early morning Report, News.

Partner Voices.

Sacramento Report: Padilla Calls San Diego Election Reforms ‘Good for Democracy’

San Diego, the second-largest city in California, doesn’t appear to obtain a great deal of attention from statewide officials. Gov. Jerry Brown and both of our U.S. senators mostly drop in just during campaign season. Yet Secretary of State Alex Padilla is here exactly what looks like when a month. Today, he was in town to command a naturalization ceremony at Golden Hall, where he assisted swear in numerous brand-new U.S. citizens.
On top of going to San Diego frequently, Padilla has partnered regularly with Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher on costs to expand citizen access. Their latest effort is a $450 million bond to modernize the state’s voting devices. If passed, it would go before citizens in 2018.
Padilla came by VOSD to talk about that effort, and San Diego’s current efforts to force regional races to a November runoff.
This conversation has actually been edited for length and clarity.
VOSD: One issue I know you’ve been dealing with, even this week you had a press conference, is your citizen modernization bond that you’re dealing with Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher. Can you inform me about that bill and why it’s needed?
Padilla: I believe the integrity of our elections is much more on the leading edge of individuals’s mind nowadays than they have actually been in a long, very long time. Whether it’s how we vote, or Russian participation in 2015’s elections and whatever between. Probably the most significant danger or the most significant worry to how we perform elections is simply that we have old equipment.

Help Us Raise $100k By the End of May

The last time there was a significant financial investment in voting systems in California was about 15 years earlier. … And so it’s time for a new round of financial investment. We know innovation has actually come a long method. We know public policy has come a long method. We have a great deal of exciting reforms that have actually been embraced in California. Things like same-day registration or more vote-by-mail or having the ability to vote early. Envision being able to vote anywhere in your county and not just the precinct location or the polling place closest to where you live. We have that now authorized. We need the brand-new systems to assist deploy those reforms that make it easier for citizens by preserving a secure election.
VOSD: You were really aggressive in pressing back against some of Donald Trump’s claims about election fraud, particularly in California. Is there a concern with outdated voting devices? Are we more prone to scams, is that a person of the dangers?
Padilla: Look, first and foremost you understand, myself working in collaboration with the county elections officials across the state of California, I wait the 2016 elections and the previous elections to that. But I believe the risks or the worry, the threat of aging equipment is if it begins to break down. …
People are worthy of to have confidence in how well the elections are run, the accuracy of the votes and the results. … In addition to the reforms that have been adopted, it rests upon brand-new equipment that assists in that. I believe having the ability to vote throughout your county is going to be extremely empowering for a lot of especially working-class households. You know San Diego is not unfamiliar with traffic, so getting home from work in town to obtain the kids from school, dinner on the table then stand in line at the ballot place before 8 o’clock can be a difficulty. However if you had the versatility to vote closer to work, or where you drop your kids off at school, or at the mall or the grocery store, to vote the week before or over the weekend, that’s hugely powerful. But that’s only enabled when we have things like tally on-demand, electronic poll books, some of those things that cost cash. The state and the counties need to operate in partnership to fund that investment. It’s much better for election administrators. More importantly, it’s much better for voters.
VOSD: Let’s discuss something a little closer to San Diego. In November, San Diego voted to change the way it holds elections, in terms of you can not win outright in a citywide election throughout a primary. Assemblyman Todd Gloria has now put an expense forward that would do the same thing for countywide elections. What’s your take on this change? And do you buy into this argument that votes should be held when the most amount of people are voting?
Padilla: I think it’s an excellent thing, and constant with other reforms I have actually seen throughout the state of California.
The other sort of popular dispute that’s growing right now is when we hold our local elections. A lot of jurisdictions have traditionally held their regional elections in odd years to not necessarily compete with prominent presidential projects. However that leads to so couple of individuals getting involved that you actually wonder how representative our democracy is. … And so, whether it’s consolidating odd-year elections to even-year elections or guaranteeing that there is indeed an overflow, more individuals have the tendency to get involved. The bottom line is there’s more people who are exercising their voice in identifying the outcome of the election. And again, that benefits democracy.
Single-Payer Health Care Gets a Price
The biggest question hanging over Sen. Ricardo Lara and Sen. Toni Atkins’ bill to produce a single-payer health care system in California is what does it cost? it will cost.
Today, we got a price quote: $400 billion.
That earned it lots of outrage and mockery by Republican political leaders.

The collective reaction of everybody knowing of the #SB 562 cost price quote: pic.twitter.com/hqtZkyEaqN
— Asm. Randy Voepel (@RandyVoepel) May 22, 2017

The expense analysis provided today figures $200 billion could be paid for with existing state, federal and local funds. The other $200 billion would have to originate from new profits, and recommends a payroll tax as an option.
” The write-up likewise notes that a universal healthcare proposition would likely minimize spending by companies and workers statewide, which presently ranges between $100 billion and $150 billion every year. For that reason, the total new costs under the bill would be between $50 billion and $100 billion each year,” keeps in mind the L.A. Times.
Amongst those who testified in favor of the costs at a Senate Appropriations hearing Monday was Kyle Thayer, a Carlsbad paramedic.
” I see each and every single day the people that don’t have health protection and the things that happen. Frequently they select between one medication and another, and wind up in the back of my ambulance for something as basic as high-blood pressure medication,” stated Thayer.
The expense cleared the Senate Appropriations Committee Thursday and now heads to the full state Senate.
Getting Imaginative on Homelessness
As San Diego’s homeless issue booms, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher’s intending to give the city another tool to help.
This week, Gonzalez Fletcher officially included San Diego to AB 932, which had aimed to give San Francisco the authority to state a shelter crisis and clear regulatory hurdles for homeless real estate tasks.
Gonzalez Fletcher became a co-sponsor of the costs composed by Assemblyman Phil Ting at the urging of San Diego City Councilman Chris Ward, who is set to lead a City Council committee on homelessness.
A spokesman for Ward stated the expense could enable the committee to “get more innovative” and think about non-traditional real estate or adaptive reuse opportunities like those Ward raised in a March memo.
Gonzalez Fletcher worried that the legislation opens the door but that the city will need to be the one to do something about it. If the bill makes it through, it will require the City board to pass new guidelines to lead the way for any ingenious actions.
” The technique does have to come in your area,” Gonzalez Fletcher stated. “The innovative options need to come in your area.”
— Lisa Halverstadt
Exactly what the Sanctuary State Expense Means for San Diego
There’s been a lot of conversation around the state and nation about Sen. Kevin de Leon’s SB 54, the sanctuary state bill.
VOSD’s Scott Lewis zeroed in on exactly what it would imply for San Diego: “If it passes in much the same type it remains in now, and the governor indications it, it would be the most substantial modification to regional migration enforcement in a years.”
ICE presently has about 18 agents working inside 3 San Diego County prisons. They would be kicked out if SB 54 passes.
Sen. Joel Anderson has stated that ICE representatives will not disappear under the bill– they might appear in less preferable places: “If we make it easier to gather someone in front of an elementary school than gathering them in a jail where they’re serving time, where do you believe ICE is going to go?” he told us.
San Diego Chances and Ends
– The nonprofit California Housing Partnership Corp. released a new report Monday that owned house the degree of the inexpensive real estate crisis in Southern California.
San Diego is 2nd to Los Angeles in regards to the most significant requirement: San Diego is 142,052 cost effective systems short of exactly what it needs.
The report endorses numerous bills in the Legislature aimed at attending to the housing crisis, including two that would produce new profits sources to fund cost effective real estate: Sen. Toni Atkins’ SB 2, which would fund cost effective real estate by enforcing a $75 cost on realty recording documents, and Sen. Jim Beall’s SB 3, a $3 billion bond to fund budget friendly real estate.
SB 2 advanced from the Senate Appropriations Committee on Thursday.
– Assemblyman Rocky Chavez published a Facebook video where he opens up about his child’s battle with schizophrenia, as part of Mental Health Awareness Week.
– An expense by Assemblyman Brian Maienschein cracking down on false and deceptive claims in family pet ads passed the Assembly this week.
Golden State News
– In scrambling to safeguard its climate policies from President Donald Trump, California is ending up being a design for other states and nations on climate modification. (New york city Times).
– An effort to reform the state’s bail system is gaining momentum. (KQED).
– Here’s a breakdown of the methods President Trump’s budget plan knocks California. (Sacramento Bee).
– The California Department of Insurance coverage is examining problems that numerous automobile insurance companies charge greater rates to drivers who reside in minority neighborhoods. (ProPublica).
– Education concerns have actually opened rifts within the Democratic Celebration, and 2018 might be a year of showdowns. (CalMatters).
This post associates with: Should Reads, Government, Sacramento Report, State Federal government.

Composed by Sara Libby.
Sara Libby is VOSD’s handling editor. She supervises VOSD’s newsroom and its material. You can reach her at sara.libby@voiceofsandiego.org or 619.325.0526.

Partner Voices.

VOSD Podcast: The Rise of Mara Elliott and a Modification at the Port

Previous attempts to expand the San Diego Convention Center have stopped working over the years– so exactly what’s stopping the mayor’s most recent expansion venture from flopping?
Bob Nelson, a long time public relations maven and previous Port of San Diego commissioner, signed up with hosts Scott Lewis and Andrew Keatts on the podcast this week to provide his insights on the storied Convention Center growth legend.
As a Port commissioner for 6 years, he has an insider’s view of waterside advancement deals because the Port is basically the landlord and custodian of the region’s tidelands.
Nelson stated Mayor Kevin Faulconer’s proposal to trek the hotel tax to money the expansion will be a tough sell, but he thinks it has a strong chance, even with early opposition and other difficulties in its way.
” I think it has a sensible prospect of winning,” he said.
Nelson said there are a couple ways the mayor can get around among the biggest obstacles– that the land needed for the growth is presently rented by someone else.

Help United States Raise $100k By the End of May

” I think it’s going to get down to whether they can make a deal with the mayor to somehow either join their interests … or discover a way to buy their lease out,” he said.
Nelson also discussed the relationship between the Port and city leaders, why he took on the Port commissioner role and why he’s leaving now.
Mara Elliott’s Powerful Viewpoints
When a brand-new city attorney is chosen, the political tides can change drastically.
Lewis and Keatts mentioned how City Attorney Mara Elliott has actually quickly shown the extraordinary power of her office to flip and form disputes about regional public affairs.
In March, for instance, Elliott wrote a memo stating short-term holiday leasings illegal under city code. She just recently told Lewis that she thought the memo would shake things up and stimulate enforcement.
But it didn’t.
” It arrived on deaf ears,” she informed Lewis.
Today, Elliott released another memo, this one throwing shade on SoccerCity, the personal proposal to redevelop the Qualcomm Stadium website into a city development with an expert soccer arena.
The memo pointed out there’s no assurance the designers would be required to construct a public river park, something that’s been among the initiative’s big selling points.
Hero of the Week
A group of moms and dads at Gage Elementary who are pushing the district to be more transparent and responsive get the accolades this week.
Goat of the Week
Rep. Duncan Hunter gets a huge fat goat this week for his action to a concern about the attack of a press reporter by a congressional candidate in Montana. When asked if it was suitable to assault a press reporter, Hunter told the Associated Press, “It’s not proper behavior. Unless the reporter deserved it.”

This article relates to: Must Reads, News, Voice of San Diego Podcast, City Attorney, Convention Center, SoccerCity

Partner Voices

Early morning Report: San Diegans Pay A few of the Highest Water Rates in the Nation

San Diegans who feel like they pay a lot for the water they use are most likely right; the common water costs here will run $80 per month. Compare that with a national average of $40 a month, and you get a sense of precisely how much San Diego’s method to handling water is costing its locals. Ry Rivard reports on how San Diegans pay almost the highest water expenses in California, and part of the reason is the local Water Authority’s continuous beef with the local provider of water, Metropolitan Water District.
” Water Authority authorities blame Metropolitan for cannot prepare for a dry spell in the early-1990s and screwing San Diego then and now,” Rivard reports. That has actually sent the Water Authority on the hunt for sources of water not managed by Metropolitan, which they have actually found from sources like Imperial County and desalinated water from Carlsbad. But that independence from Metropolitan comes at a cost: We’re contracted to buy a lot of desalinated water, and it is the most pricey water option we have.
– Pricey water be damned, the Census Bureau reports San Diego is in the leading 10 cities for recent population development. (KPBS).
Labor Council Drama: San Diego Explained.
Just recently labor unions in San Diego have actually experienced an earthquake at the Labor Council, the company that has typically arranged unions into a political force to be reckoned with. After major claims were leveled versus the head of the Labor Council, people started to take sides, and the joined front of the unions started to crack. Scott Lewis and NBC 7’s Monica Dean unite themselves to diminish exactly what has been happening with local labor unions and the rift will affect the political power of the groups in our most recent San Diego Explained.
Faith Indeed.
Our buddies over at The Kept Faith podcast talk all things San Diego sports, and this time they sent our own Andrew Keatts and Scott Lewis to a Padres game to make some observations. The Padres have a promotion going today that is riling fans, but nothing riles fans rather as well as being the worst team in baseball.
The Fight Over San Diego Unified’s Anti-Bullying Program.
KPBS’s Megan Burks examines the grievances in the moms and dad lawsuit against a San Diego Unified program that discourages bullying of Muslim students. The parents declare in the lawsuit that the program is unconstitutional, and that efforts to consist of Muslim cultures in social studies lessons totals up to the district preferring one faith over others. “It is essentially promoting for Muslim culture,” says one complainant. The program was developed in collaboration with the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a group the complainants say they are worried may have ties to terrorism, in spite of there being no proof to support that concern.

Assist Us Raise $100k By the End of May.

– The Union-Tribune also recorded numerous arguments from people with varying viewpoints about the district’s anti-bullying program.
Lightning Round.
– Sea World San Diego is going complete speed ahead with its plan to open its biggest, fastest roller rollercoaster yet. (Union-Tribune).
– Armed with a new “Marine Coastal Management Strategy,” La Jollans are promoting action to address the growing sea lion (” pinniped”) population on their beach. (La Jolla Light).
– Escondido settled a claim with the ACLU by consenting to pay $550,000 over the city’s rejection of a shelter for undocumented kids. Both sides are celebrating over how the settlement implies they won. (Union-Tribune).
– When asked if it’s cool for elected officials to assault pesky journalists (as apparently happens now), Rep. Duncan Hunter responded that it would be “unsuitable, unless the press reporter deserved it.” (NBC 7).
– Those “Top Weapon” sequel rumors were all true. I’m informed some individuals are still holding out for “Fast Times at Ridgemont High 2,” though. (NBC 7).
Seth Hall is a regional writer and technologist. You can email him at voice@s3th.com or follow him on Twitter: @loteck.
This article associates with: Early morning Report, News.

Composed by Seth Hall.
Seth Hall is a local author and technologist. You can reach him at voice@s3th.com or follow him on Twitter: @loteck.

Partner Voices.

‘It’s Even worse Than You Believe'': Educators, Students Say Online Cheating Is Pervasive

The online courses San Diego Unified has utilized to improve its graduation rate are shockingly easy to cheat, and students at schools throughout the district are taking advantage.
The online courses enabled trainees like Fernando Saucedo, a senior at Hoover High, to make up credits he previously stopped working– in some cases in a matter of days or weeks. However Saucedo said he and everybody he understands who’s taken an online course understands that finding responses to test and quiz questions is as basic as opening a 2nd computer internet browser and looking up answers in genuine time.
” The online courses essentially save you from not graduating, so I like them. However I don’t think they’re an effective method to discover. We all know we can discover all the responses online and everybody looks them up,” said Saucedo, who’s taken three online credit-recovery courses at Hoover.
Saucedo’s story is a familiar one. I recently went to East Village High School, where trainees freely demonstrated for me how simple the courses are to video game.
There, I saw trainees Google quiz questions from their online courses and bring up websites where other students have actually uploaded responses. I saw one student type rubbish where short answers were supposed to go and seen as the computer system marked the response as total. One student stored screenshots of test questions on her cell phone because she said the very same questions typically appear on second and third efforts to pass tests.
A district spokesman didn’t deny to the San Diego Union-Tribune that online courses could be quickly cheated, but informed the paper that claims that unfaithful happens were simply “anecdotal.”.

Assist United States Raise $100k By the End of Might.

Since then, more instructors and trainees have actually come forward to share their experiences with cheating and online courses.
Elizabeth Ahlgren worked at Morse High before she just recently retired.
” I retired after teaching for 39 years. I taught struggling math students during the last 3 years along with 2nd year algebra. The cheating was excessive for me to endure so I retired. It’s even worse than you believe. Nearly all high school students have mobile phones. They google the questions on their phones as they take a test or test,” she wrote in an email.
Ahlgren mentioned that online classes aren’t brand-new to the district. In 2015, the district paid Scottsdale, Ariz.-based Edgenuity $800,000 to establish online courses lined up with entrance requirements to the University of California. In 2016, the district re-upped the agreement, for an overall of $1.28 million.
Before that, the district utilized online classes that were established by Peak, a business that used comparable classes that teachers say were likewise easy to cheat. When the district changed to Edgenuity, teachers hoped the new software would make it easier to stop the cheating. That hasn’t taken place.
Ahlgren said the issue boils down to school districts focusing on high graduation rates over real learning.
” We have actually piled on more requirements for students and after that we identify the school as stopping working when the kids fail their classes. The national screening hysteria has actually triggered districts to increase graduation requirements to the point where we have produced an illogical situation for our trainees.”.
The district’s press workplace did not respond to questions about whether San Diego Unified authorities are investigating claims of cheating and did not say when district leaders first became mindful of the grievances.
But an email acquired by VOSD reveals that teachers at Patrick Henry High in San Carlos are aware of how easy the courses are to faster way.
Courses are formally taught by teachers at iHigh Virtual Academy, the district’s head office for online knowing. Educators at conventional schools may be assigned to monitor or “coach” trainees taking online classes, but iHigh instructors evaluate the work and grade tests with little to no physical interaction with students.
Elizabeth Bayless Humphrey, who works as a graduate coach at Patrick Henry, explained in an e-mail to her colleagues why it’s challenging to suppress the issue:.

” Cheating during online knowing is an issue for a range of reasons: accessibility of unfaithful software has increased and also student [sic] can work independently at home. Colleges often agreement with a proctoring software application that assists. It video records the trainee’s actions as well as what is on their screens. This is really expensive!
With our own iHigh/Edgenuity courses, the only time students are needed to be ‘proctored’ on site are for the midterm and last cumulative tests. At the time of proctoring they are kept track of and will get a no if they are seen talking, utilizing a phone, or opening up other windows on their screen. The business that our district utilizes (Edgenuity) also updates their course content periodically and aims to develop test concerns that are special. In a class setting, as trainee knowing needs end up being more obvious to the teacher, excessively high scores for a specific student may become suspicious and result in subsequent.”.

Humphrey also wrote that it’s possible for instructors to catch students cheating if they flow through the classroom and display students while they take tests. However, as Humphrey explains, trainees only have to complete two tests in the existence of instructors. Other quizzes and tests can be completed from home– away from the spying eyes of instructors.
For San Diego Unified, that versatility is likewise one of online courses’ biggest selling points. In an explanation of how the district reached its record-setting 2016 graduation rate, officials gave credit in no little part to online classes:.

” One significant initiative in specific is revealing significant pledge in assisting struggling students be successful. That is the intro of online credit recovery courses. These courses permit trainees who previously dealt with problems to complete their work in an online knowing environment. Last year, some 20% of the finishing class took online courses. These courses offer trainees more flexibility and the possibility to operate at their own rate, after school or on weekends. That stated, all courses are approved by the University of California to make sure quality and scholastic rigor.”.

By Saucedo’s account, the existence of an instructor who monitors students as they take online classes isn’t enough to make the coursework significant. Saucedo stated he stopped working the first online course he took because he put things off and fell behind.
” Basically there are no instructors, so I didn’t feel pressure,” he said. “I simply procrastinated and goofed off with my phone the whole time. There’s a monitor who remains in that class, and he would inform us to get on top of our work. But most of us didn’t care what he had to state.”.
Scant research study exists to reveal online courses are in fact an efficient method for students to find out– a crucial concern, especially for trainees who are retaking classes to recover credits they previously missed out on.
Online courses typically come in two varieties. If they haven’t previously tried a course, trainees can take online classes for first-time credit. If they’ve formerly failed a course, students take the credit-recovery option– a pared-down variation of the traditional courses they take with teachers.
If trainees are taking online courses for newbie credit, they have to sit through the whole course, which as a general rule takes roughly 60 hours– or an hour a day for 12 weeks– to complete, a district spokesperson stated last year.
Students retaking classes they formerly stopped working, however, typically require much less time. That’s since students are provided a pretest before they begin coursework. If trainees get at least 7 from 10 responses proper on pretests, they can skip over that section of the course. There’s no point in making students endure a semester-long course if they just had a hard time on a couple of specific principles, the thinking goes.
The issue, instructors say, is that trainees can Google answers in genuine time as they take the pretests, too. That’s how some students say they’re able to knock out those credits in a matter of days.
Stacy Williams, who teaches at TRACE– an alternative San Diego Unified school geared toward 18- to 22-year-olds with impairments– is likewise concerned about unfaithful. However that’s not all.
She said in the past, more trainees participated in TRACE until they were 22, and took those years to discover occupation and life abilities that would help them live independently. Now more trainees are using online courses to make a diploma and leave school previously, she said.
More worrying yet for Williams is that teachers whose students rapidly pass online courses and graduate are earning praise from administrators, despite how well-prepared students are to leave.
She understands of one trainee who stopped working 2 semesters of a routine course. However when that same student took the online version of the course, he ended up within weeks and earned a B, she said.
” Some of these kids read at 4th grade and listed below but are leaving the district with a diploma,” Williams stated. “I believe some teachers believe they’re doing the student favors by passing them through. They might pity them, or stress that without a diploma, the trainee will be kept back in life. But in the long run, this actually harms them.”.
Williams believes the problem returns to a systemic issue wherein the only procedure of success valued by school districts is a diploma. Rather of assisting the trainees discover scholastic content and abilities that will assist them later in life, the school district is motivating trainees to take a much easier, quicker route.
Williams stated that when she initially learned how she was supposed to support and keep track of students taking online courses, a colleague recommended she look at students’ responses prior to they send tests and tell trainees which answers they have to alter in order to get a passing grade.
The district said recently it doesn’t recommend teachers to give out responses to test or test concerns, however didn’t comment as to whether it’s within the guidelines for instructors to tell trainees which questions they got incorrect.
In other school districts where issues with cheating in online courses have been noted, principals openly encouraged instructors to do this, a practice called offering “address checks.”.
For Williams, all of it amounts to the school district offering diplomas with doubtful worth.
” I feel it’s unfair to deceive our trainees to believe that by providing these credits that they will go on to college and be successful,” she stated. “We as a district are not preparing trainees for the real life by offering ‘fake’ diplomas.”.
This post connects to: Education, Graduation Rates.

Composed by Mario Koran.
Mario asks concerns and composes stories about San Diego schools. Reach him straight at 619.325.0531, or by e-mail: mario@vosd.org.

Partner Voices.

San Diegans Pay A few of the Highest Water Rates in the State and Nation

San Diego has some of the most expensive water in California– and in the country.
A common San Diego household pays about $80 a month for water. The nationwide average is less than $40 a month, inning accordance with a recent study by the American Water Works Association.
Water in California is more pricey than somewhere else, however San Diego still has amongst the greatest rates in the state, inning accordance with another current study. The most expensive water in the state is found in communities along the state’s Central Coast, like Santa Barbara.
By all signs, water costs in San Diego will keep rising.
Since 2007, the expense of water from the San Diego County Water Authority has doubled.
In its worst-case situation for the future, the firm forecasts its water expenses could almost double again in the next years.

Assist United States Raise $100k By the End of May

The Water Authority purchases water from a variety of sources then resells that water to local water agencies, like the city of San Diego’s water department.
Those regional firms have their own methods to control costs– or increase them.
Within the county, the difference between the greatest and most affordable expense is huge, depending upon where a consumer lives. A family in the rural North County neighborhood of Yuima pays $110 a month for the same amount of water for which a family in Lakeside pays $58, inning accordance with a current study of rates by the Otay Water District. The city of San Diego’s rates fall in between those two extremes.
Water rates are notoriously tough to fairly compare. Each water district has its own circumstances, including some beyond its control. Weather, population, topography, earnings, when a community was first settled, political choices and even the kinds of soils all impact rates.
However the general pattern across San Diego has actually been ever-rising rates. Not only that, however rates appear to be rising faster here than elsewhere in Southern California.
One of the biggest chauffeurs is the Water Authority’s effort to buy itself from a bad marriage.
For many years, the Water Authority has actually been trying to distance itself from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, the Los Angeles-based firm from which the Water Authority gets much of its water.
Water Authority authorities blame Metropolitan for failing to prepare for a dry spell in the early-1990s and screwing San Diego then and now. To prevent being so dependent on Metropolitan for water, the Water Authority went on a costs spree to find brand-new sources of water. It also constructed or broadened location dams to prepare for a dry spell or other emergency. The Water Authority has actually done so largely with the support of business community and ratepayers.
” Increasing reliability comes at an expense, and we have actually never ever avoided telling that to stakeholders or ratepayers,” said Mike Lee, a Water Authority spokesperson.
In 2003, the Water Authority consented to buy enough Colorado River water for approximately 1.6 million individuals a year from another water agency in Imperial County. That was the biggest water purchase of its kind in United States. Then, a year and a half earlier, it assisted open the largest desalination plant in the nation, in Carlsbad.
Those supplies are more expensive: The brand-new water is about 62 percent of the Water Authority’s supplies, however 72 percent of the company’s water costs.
In San Diego, the most costly water originates from the desalination plant. Its water costs about $2,100 for an acre foot of water, which is roughly as much as eight individuals require in a year. The least expensive water still comes straight from Metropolitan, which costs about $1,000 an acre foot.
Meena Westford, a Metropolitan representative in San Diego, said the Water Authority has actually produced a scenario where it is contractually obligated to purchase the most costly water in Southern California– desalinated water– while it’s only optional to purchase the cheaper Metropolitan water.
” As a San Diego homeowner, I don’t want our most pricey water products to be our baseload and our most affordable products to be our insurance plan,” she said. “That’s why we will have the most costly water in California.”
But there’s a gray area of water that is at the heart of San Diego’s greater rates and a limitless legal dispute. That’s the Imperial County water.
The Water Authority calls the water it obtains from Imperial County its own “independent” supply of water. Metropolitan discounts that and says San Diego’s so-called self-reliance relies in large part on using Metropolitan’s system. Due to the fact that the Water Authority never built a pipeline to the Colorado River, it needs to depend on Metropolitan to bring the Imperial County water to San Diego.
Metropolitan charges cash for that. The Water Authority believes Metropolitan is overcharging it by approximately 465 percent to bring that water to San Diego.
The Water Authority filed a suit over the concern numerous years back. One court concurred Metropolitan’s rates were too expensive. Metropolitan appealed. An appellate court’s choice is expected by mid-August. That decision is likely going to be interested the state Supreme Court.
At stake has to do with $7 billion over the next numerous years. If the Water Authority wins, rates might do something they never do– decrease. If it loses, it’s going to be stuck paying more than it wants for another twenty years to an agency it is aiming to disentangle itself from.
That’s one of the reasons the Water Authority has launched a statewide “Stop the Spending!” project blaming Metropolitan for increasing expenses in San Diego. In March, the Water Authority signed an 11-month, $220,000 deal with a law firm and with Southwest Strategies, a San Diego-based public relations firm, to “interact plainly with the general public and other public companies” about the suit and other matters. Among the PR project’s symptoms is a regional TV section featuring a pizza shop owner grumbling about rising rates.
The Water Authority has also sent several letters to 1,100 people in Southern California– mainly politicians and city authorities– aiming to encourage them to investigate Metropolitan for “overspending, overcharging and unexpected borrowing.”
Across California, other water companies praise San Diego’s plan to diversify its supplies. However they likewise question how pricey it is.
Shane Chapman, basic supervisor of the Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, differed with the Water Authority’s campaign. He applauded the Water Authority, for diversifying its water system.
” Nevertheless,” Chapman stated in a letter to the Water Authority, “I am entrusted the impression that SDCWA’s current public relations campaign ‘stop the costs’ and the on-going barrage of lawsuits challenging Metropolitan’s water rates and charges, are extremely costly methods to direct attention far from the other expense chauffeurs in your constituent’s [sic] water expenses.”
He pointed out that San Diego consumers are now paying about $27 more a month more than they were back in 2009. Clients in Los Angeles County– who likewise get Metropolitan water– have actually only seen their rates increase by $11 throughout that exact same duration.
Maureen Stapleton, basic manager of the Water Authority, replied to Chapman. Without disputing any of his numbers, she acknowledged that the new water supplies have “contributed to the rising cost of the Water Authority’s supply” however shifted blame to Metropolitan.
Metropolitan’s general supervisor, Jeffrey Kightlinger, said the Water Authority is simply trying to duck expenses by slamming and suing his firm.
” Three million individuals want to shift cost to 16 million individuals,” he stated, describing the population of San Diego and the other parts of Southern California that Metropolitan serves.
The Water Authority sees the circumstance in reverse, as 16 million people attempting to overcharge 3 million San Diegans.
Since both parties are at limitless odds, it appears only a court can settle the matter.
Until then, it’s hard to know how much rates will keep rising.
If the Water Authority wins its claim, rates might still go up as much as 58 percent or just 11 percent, depending upon other factors. If the Water Authority loses, rates could increase by as much as 87 or as low as 28 percent. For next year, the Water Authority proposes a modest 3.7 percent boost, much of which it states is related to Metropolitan’s charges.
Beyond politics, San Diego’s rates are high, in part due to the fact that of its range from major products. There are over 250 miles between San Diego and its main source of water, the Colorado River, and 600 miles between San Diego and its second significant source, the rivers of Northern California.
San Diego also struggles with a historical mix of bad preparation and misfortune. In the early 1900s, Los Angeles constructed an aqueduct to drain pipes water from the Eastern Sierra, a choice that offers the city inexpensive water to this day. Orange County has large groundwater basins, which can essentially offer totally free water. San Diego never built its own pipeline system to a far-off river nor does it have any major groundwater basins to tap.
So, for now, it’ses a good idea a markup to buy water from others.

This short article connects to: Federal government, Science/Environment, Water

Partner Voices

San Diego Explained: The Rifts in Organized Labor

Tension and bitterness are driving a wedge between local organized labor groups right now.
Unions and other arranged labor groups are a lot like other interest groups– in some cases they agree with one another, in some cases they don’t.
When they are joined, though– either behind a prospect or a proposed policy– they can wield a great deal of power, which is why the current leadership shakeup at the Labor Council is making such big waves in San Diego politics.
In this week’s San Diego Explained, NBC 7’s Monica Dean and Voice of San Diego’s Scott Lewis raise the curtain on the present battle for the heart of organized labor.
Correction: An earlier version of this post included an image of previous local labor leader German Ramirez and misidentified him as Mickey Kasparian.
This article relates to: San Diego Explained, News, Corrections

Partner Voices