Reality Check: Is Sherri Lightner Truly Proposing a Ban on Airbnb?

For nearly two years, city leaders have wearied over problems and a legal gray location surrounding short-term vacation rentals in city areas.
Now, in a spectacular move, City Council President Sherri Lightner has actually arranged a Tuesday City board vote to clarify that renting homes to visitors isn’t really allowed single-family communities. If her City Council coworkers agree and the law endures any mayoral veto or other obstacles, it could have huge repercussions on the a great deal of people leasing their homes to visitors. No one conflicts that it could get rid of the practice in many residential areas of the city. There is, however, a major conflict about exactly what it might do for homeowners simply renting out parts of their locations to visitors while owners stay at the website.
We wished to describe exactly what we know about the strategy through two reality checks. Initially, some background.
As word of her strategies spread out, short-term rental huge Airbnb has asked fans to project against Lightner’s proposition.
If You Worth This Service, Please Contribute Today

Airbnb claimed in a recent Facebook post and an online call to action that Lightner’s proposal could make it prohibited for San Diegans to rent or share their houses. The company likewise declared that renting out parts of your home while you are still there, so-called home-sharing– a distinct kind of short-term rental– would be effectively forbidden.
There are 2 types of short-term rentals: whole-home or house leasings, and home sharing, where a host remains on site.
Airbnb, one of the dominant gamers in the short-term rental market, reports that 67 percent of its hosts are renting their entire houses or apartment or condos. A third of them are offering a personal or shared room in their house.
An often-cited 2007 city lawyer’s memo concluded there weren’t clear city guidelines disallowing or supervising these short-term leasings.
This has sustained confusion and disappointment as more short-term rentals pop up and San Diego residents, specifically in beach neighborhoods, complain of rowdy guests in next-door neighbors’ homes. Meanwhile, vacation-rental operators are pulling in cash and paying taxes. Airbnb reports that it paid more than $7.5 million in city hotel taxes in 2015.
Last December, City Attorney Jan Goldsmith weighed in with a memo.
His office restated the ambiguity of current city code and suggested the mayor and City board might make 3 modifications if they desired present city rules to apply to short-term rentals. Goldsmith didn’t take a position on whether they should make those tweaks.
Lightner’s now pushing two of those changes.
Here’s the current meaning of visitor accommodations.

Lightner wants to get rid of the word “primarily” to broaden the definition of visitor accommodations. She likewise wants to define visitors and travelers as transients staying for less than a month.
These modifications would imply that even short-term rental operators who just occasionally welcome guests would be affected.
Statement: “Legislators are satisfying Nov. 1, and are thinking about a proposition that could remove San Diego homeowners’ capability to legally short-term rent or perhaps share their house,” Airbnb composed in a recent online campaign.
Judgment: Mainly Real
Airbnb’s blast claimed Lightner’s proposition might prohibit entire home-rentals and home sharing. We’ll deal with the first part of the claim about short-term leasings here.
Something isn’t disputed: Both Lightner and short-term leasing supporters state the proposal would disallow whole-home rentals in single-family areas. Those relatively little modifications to the city code would clarify that short-term rental operations in single-family houses and homes, not just hotels, count as visitor accommodations.
Lightner thinks visitor lodgings are already prohibited in single-family communities under the current code. She argues her new regulation would simply clarify that, explain where whole-home leasings are allowed and open the door for enforcement.
” This needs to be implemented. It has done not have enforcement for a large number of years to the point where folks believe it is a right now,” Lightner stated. “It is not a right. It has actually never been a right.”
Her main goal was to find a method to fight issue short-term leasings in single-family areas. She’s pressing this legislation in her last weeks as a city councilwoman. She’ll be described out in early December.
Yet her recommendations wouldn’t amount to a ban on all short-term leasings, as Airbnb’s declaration implies.
Her proposed changes allow short-term rentals in some industrial zones and 2 multi-family zones. An evaluation of the city’s zoning grid map exposes small spots of those two multi-family zones in 10 city areas.
Sheri Carr, a former city code enforcement official who dealt with Lightner’s proposal, said whole-home rentals would also still be allowed in minimal areas in more than a dozen San Diego areas with their own zoning regulations. These are known as planned district ordinances and a handful of prime tourist locations, including parts of Mission Beach, La Jolla and downtown, have them.
Information provided to Voice of San Diego previously this year revealed Mission Beach alone was home to 14 percent of Airbnb’s whole-home or home rentals in the city.
Carr said she reviewed the plans for each of those planned districts and found that whole-home holiday leasings would still be allowed parts of many of them, including in Objective Beach.
An attorney hired by getaway rental platforms estimated 70 percent of whole-home rentals and home-sharing operations in the city could be removed by the guideline modification.
That price quote didn’t incorporate Airbnbs in prepared districts, where Lightner’s office has actually said present rules still would apply, and it presumes home-sharing would be banned, which I’ll cover below.
Setting aside the lawyer’s price quote, the business’s online claim has been that San Diego citizens might lose their capability to rent their homes if Lightner’s proposal is approved.
That’s mostly real.
The essential subtlety here is that while whole-home short-term rentals would be banned in many areas if Lightner’s proposal is approved, they would not be banned in all parts of the city.
Now let’s tackle exactly what’ll happen to house sharing if Lightner’s proposal is authorized.
Statement: “This would efficiently ban house sharing in San Diego,” Airbnb wrote in a current online campaign.
Ruling: Unproven
Lightner’s repeatedly stated she’s not aiming to stop owners from leasing spaces of their houses while they stay on site, otherwise referred to as house sharing. But lots of people believe that’s exactly what the proposition would do whether she plans for it or not.
In an analysis sent to City Council members on behalf of rental platforms, San Diego-based lawyer Robin Madaffer stated Lightner’s proposition does not distinguish between whole-home leasings and house sharing.
As an outcome, Madaffer declared Lightner’s modifications would offer the city the ability to successfully close down home sharing in a lot of parts of the city.
” We believe the expanded meaning of visitor lodgings would use to home-sharing activities and would prevent home-sharing activities in almost all zones,” Madaffer wrote. “A various analysis would likely lead to enforceability problems.”
A minimum of one other lawyer agrees.
Omar Passons, an outspoken critic of the city’s technique to short-term rentals, said Lightner’s proposal could successfully close down house sharing due to the fact that it lets the city use the visitor accommodation meaning to any operators in residential areas who host paid visitors.
However Lightner said she’s confident her step doesn’t affect home sharing due to the fact that the city’s already addressing it with its boarding and lodging guidelines. She’s not trying to change that language and isn’t asking code officers to punish home sharers.
The city’s taken the position that its boarding and lodging guidelines limit home sharing in city neighborhoods however the city attorney’s workplace concluded in its December memo that those guidelines required considerable information– and don’t easily cover short-term rentals.
Short-term leasing advocates have said current city guidelines don’t work for home sharers.
The boarder and guest guidelines enable those who own property in some multi-family zones to host visitors for a minimum of 7 days. Stays need to be at least 1 Month in single-family domestic zones.
Those timeframes don’t fit together with normal short-term rental stays. Airbnb reports its guests stayed in San Diego homes and homes for an average of simply 3.6 nights in the last year.
The city’s bed and breakfast policies aren’t practical to numerous short-term rental operators, either.
Smaller ones are allowed in the majority of multi-family zones but permits are required for single-family communities. They cost a minimum of $3,000 to $5,000 and even larger deposits are needed per city policies– an amount occasional house sharers are unlikely to hand over.
In the meantime, hundreds of San Diegans are renting out rooms using Airbnb and other platforms regardless of these inconvenient rules. The city hasn’t gone after them en masse therefore they’ve continued to run.
Then came Lightner’s proposal.
Lightner’s stated she isn’t attempting to motivate code enforcement to go after home sharers.
But short-term rental advocates fear the worst.
We call a claim unfounded when there’s inadequate proof to back up a declaration. For now, it’s uncertain whether Lightner’s proposal would effectively prohibit home sharing.
She says that’s not her intent. The remainder of the City Council and if the changes are approved, other city authorities, will play a role in deciding how this would operate in practice.
This post relates to: Federal government, Getaway Leasings

Composed by Lisa Halverstadt
Lisa Halverstadt is a press reporter at Voice of San Diego. Know of something she should check out? You can call her directly at lisa@vosd.org or 619.325.0528.

Partner Voices

Morning Report: Truth Checks on the Getaway Rental Restriction

Numerous San Diegans are renting out rooms utilizing Airbnb and other online sites despite confusion about whether the practice is in fact legal.
Existing city code is unclear and has actually enabled the growth in whole-home rentals and partial home sharing to continue. In some parts of San Diego, particularly along the coast, the getaway rental war has actually been raving in between those who make money through short-term leasings and their next-door neighbors who state it’s ruining the quality of life for everybody else.
Clearness could come Tuesday– that’s when City Council President Sherri Lightner has arranged a City board vote over proposed changes to the rules about renting out the homes of visitors.
Airbnb caught wind of Lightner’s proposed modifications and took to social networks to tell its fans and fans that the proposition would get rid of San Diego residents’ ability to lawfully short-term rent or even share their homes, efficiently prohibiting home sharing in San Diego.
If You Value This Service, Please Donate Today

VOSD’s Lisa Halverstadt truth checks Airbnb’s claim and describes that while the proposal would bar whole-home rentals in numerous single-family neighborhoods, it would not total up to a ban on all short-term leasings.
Hey San Diego: Homelessness Is Not an Unsolvable Issue
The U-T’s Dan McSwain has actually been investigating the city’s homeless crisis given that June.
In his newest report, he compares San Diego data on homelessness to federal and other state’s stats, which makes it painfully clear just how severely the city is going to pieces while much of the rest of the nation is making development.
McSwain states San Diego’s problem is political: “We have mainly outsourced our empathy to government, which choice has been unwise,” he writes.
He blames the city’s general lack of empathy, as well as points a finger toward the area’s unwillingness to construct housing for homeless individuals, a management vacuum and the city’s sluggish accept of the so-called Housing First policy, which essentially states homeless individuals must be offered subsidized real estate without being forced to satisfy any rigid requirements.
– VOSD has been focusing on the city’s rising homeless crisis, too. Catch up on our newest stories.
Relax, Chargers Fans
Fans thinking about appearing to Qualcomm Arena in the wrong-colored jersey may want to reassess: San Diego has the unique dishonor of being the NFL stadium with the highest variety of per-game arrests over the previous 5 seasons.
The Washington Post ran the numbers and had a look at the increase of unruly fan habits around NFL stadiums throughout the country.
Police made about 25 arrests per video game in between 2011 and 2015 at The Q, and following San Diego were the arenas in New york city, Oakland and Pittsburgh.
Weekend News Roundup
– A instructors union and charter school supporters are putting loan into supporting opposing candidates in the race for a seat on the San Diego County Board of Education. (U-T).
– A rifle made to look like a strolling cane was among the dozens of firearms gathered at a weapon buyback event in San Diego’s Palm City area over the weekend. The event was sponsored by law enforcement and neighborhood leaders.( CBS 8 San Diego).
– Sharp Health care administration and its nurses union cannot seem to agree on the numbers that need to be locked into a brand-new contract. (Times of San Diego).
– The Associated Press takes a look at several deaths of workers who were found dead in freezers, either due to the fact that they were caught inside by broken doors or conquered by deadly fumes from solidified carbon dioxide. Aaron Rabinowitz, whose father Henry Rabinowitz died inside a freezer in 2007 at the family’s Gelato Vero Caffe, makes a look in the story and says he thinks all industrial freezers must be outfitted with some type of alarm.
– San Diego High School trainees held a rally Saturday in assistance of Step I, which, if passed, would allow the school to remain at its present location on devoted parkland in Balboa Park.
Here’s a VOSD explainer on Measure I. (Fox 5 San Diego).
– The once booming card space cluster in San Diego has almost folded. One of the city’s 2 staying video gaming establishments recently closed and the other one is having actually permitting problems related to a federal criminal investigation. (U-T).
– San Diego artist Ramon “Chunky” Sanchez, a widely known figure and one of the founders of Chicano Park in Barrio Logan, has actually passed away. (San Diego Free Press).
– The daddy of the guy who was shot and killed by a police officer in El Cajon last month announced that he’s beginning a foundation to assist promote authorities reform. (U-T).
– Tijuana Innovadora, an event taking place in the border city Nov. 3-10, is kinda a huge offer. (U-T).
– Y’ all have up until 5 p.m. Nov. 1 to ask for a mail-in ballot. (Fox 5 San Diego).
– The scary clown epidemic hit San Diego over the weekend. (Morning News U.S.A).
For those of you looking to make some sense of this insane clown thing, On the Media’s segment on creepy clown sightings uses a historic point of view that might help soothe your nerves.
Social Media Moments.
– A huge high-five to the owner of this weird and rad Halloween house, which is totally confusing and freaking people out.
– This man’s whoopee cushion outfit is THE BEST.
This article relates to: News, Morning Report, Trip Leasings.

Partner Voices.

Vote as a Citizen, Not as a Fan

By Dallas McLaughlin|1 hour back
San Diego is not a sports city; it’s a city with sports in it.
If you are a San Diegan, you know this. If you’re a diehard sports fan, you know this. You have actually sat in the stadium beside the countless Raiders fans or Dodgers fans, or Chiefs, Cubs, Broncos, Cardinals, Packers fans. It’s not fun to sit there and be berated by fans from actual sports cities, who either flew into town for the game, or moved to San Diego for the weather condition however kept their loyalty. An incredibly small portion of Chargers fans would ever own to a roadway video game, and practically none would fly across country for one.
As a sports city, we’re less fair-weather fans and more casual realists.
Fans don’t believe in reality. Fans live in the realm of “exactly what if?” They live in a world where anything can take place, and every year could be our year in spite of every figure showing it won’t be.
If You Worth This Service, Please Donate Today

It’s not a bad method to live. It’s fun! It lets you escape whatever may be genuine in your life, and instead spend your time yelling at a TV, purchasing clothing and eating chips. And drinking beer.
Realists, on the other hand, see the difficult numbers.
Neither is best or incorrect. When it pertains to picking how your entire city spends its loan, and establishes its future, however, being a fan is the worst thing you can be.
When you take a look at Step C, you’ll find a lot of projections and “what ifs,” however you cannot and will not discover any difficult financial information that proves it’s a real win for the city. Even the real expense of this task is unknown, and by all projections (even the Chargers’ version) there are funds that are unaccounted for that will be paid in some way by somebody. Oh. Cool!
In fact, when you start to check out into the step, a great deal of things end up being really evident, and very frightening. Things that are so in-your-face, even the diehardest of fans can’t explain their reasoning.
As a lifelong fan taking a look at these claims, I have a truly hard time seeing anything however enthusiastic best-case scenarios being used as actual data:
A new downtown arena will generate a lot of new profits.
How? I suggest, there will be more people remaining in the hotels, I picture. So, current workers may get more shifts, and they might hire more staff members. Possibly! There might be new hotels built! Then you get more building and construction work, more workers and more jobs. That might occur. We do not know, obviously. Nobody does.
Rejuvenating East Town will generate a great deal of brand-new income.
How? I imagine you ‘d wish to open up new restaurants and bars in the area. Obviously, downtown and East Village are littered with bars and restaurants already, however these would be more … brand-new? Reasonably we’re just talking about increased foot traffic 10 weeks a year, so you have the problem of keeping people in the area outside of the Chargers home games, but it cannot be that hard, right? I have no idea. Nobody does.
You could be believing to yourself: “All this worked for Petco.” And you would be right. But decreasing that bunny hole produces much bigger questions. Didn’t Petco already renew the East Village? Prior to Petco, that area was literally dumped-on land and structures that were falling apart. How much is delegated revitalize? What parts of land, and houses and organisations are we displacing for this “revitalization”? Then we have to take a look at a number: 81. That’s’ how many house games the Padres play in a year. That’s a lot more than 10 Chargers home video games.
The convadium will bring in bigger conventions and more individuals.
Sure! Why not? I suggest, you keep in mind all those cool boat reveals you used to go to on the field of a football arena, right? Using my fan logic, this argument makes good sense, due to the fact that convadium is a word that makes no sense, and a great deal of abundant men in suits keep saying it while smiling.
Having a brand-new NFL stadium is a fantastic investment.
Then why aren’t the NFL and the Chargers’ owners, the Spanos family, making the complete investment? I understand they’re investing a couple of hundred million dollars, which is peanuts compared to what they’re requesting for and especially compared with just how much they stand to profit. So, why not go all in?
It has to do with civic pride.
Is that what the Spanos family had when it decided to relocate to L.A. however was obstructed by NFL owners? That does not seem like San Diego pride to me. If it was really about being a prideful San Diegan, then you ‘d develop a new arena anywhere the city informed you to– not where you wanted it.
And, if you wish to feel real civic pride, would not you want functional roads? Moneyed schools? A completely staffed 911 call center? I know the emergency dispatcher probably never ever scored a touchdown in the NFL, however she or he might just save your life one day.
Being a fan, you can explain away all these negatives with “The Chargers belong in San Diego!” And I get that. I actually do. However when the owner of the group does not feel that method, you have to ask yourself what it is you’re supporting. A logo design? Players who may or may unknown you live? An abundant custom of Chargers football? If that holds true, just count our playoff wins.
As a fan of Step C, you are putting your fandom ahead of truth, which’s an exceptionally scary location to be. You’re toying with genuine loan and real income to develop a stadium for someone who has absolutely no pride in San Diego.
Overlook the on-the-field play! Disregard that Dean Spanos currently loaded his bags and aimed to leave! Neglect the financial research study that says this won’t be good for the city! Because it certainly exists. Neglect the man behind the drape. Be a fan … follow the yellow and powder blue brick roadway.
I am a San Diego sports fan and have actually been all my life. I invested years cheering and weeping with my groups’ victories and defeats. I have actually invested thousands of dollars to watch it take place. Now, I take a look at all the pitches the Spanoses and the city officials who support Measure C continually make. They sound attractive. They sound fun. They sound fanatical. However as a 36-year-old realist with credit debt and car payments, I see exactly what this actually is: abundant guys utilizing other individuals to make them loan.
Dallas McLaughlin is the co-host of The Kept Faith podcast and an award-winning writer and comedian based in San Diego. McLaughlin’s commentary has actually been modified for style and clarity. See anything in there we should truth check? Inform us exactly what to have a look at here.
This post connects to: Viewpoint, Chargers Arena, Convadium

Composed by Viewpoint
Op-eds and Letters to the Editor on the issues that matter in San Diego. Have something to say? Submit a commentary.

Partner Voices

San Diego Chooses: Grappling With Death on Your Tally

In our final episode before Election Day, we speak about the capital punishment, which California voters will have a chance to end this year or reform.
Proposal 62 would end the death penalty in California. Proposition 66 would aim to speed up appeals of death sentence verdicts, which could result in quicker executions or exonerations. (If both pass, the one with the most votes takes effect.).
First Sara Libby and I talk with Mike and Cent Moreau, whose son Tim was killed in Oregon in 1990. They talk about that terrible case and the ethical problem they faced before they cast their votes this year on the 2 death sentence measures. On the one hand, philosophically, they think it’s wrong to eliminate somebody else. On the other, they have seen the criminal justice system up close and discovered there is some worth in the death sentence.
They speak about an useful advantage of the death penalty: It can offer leverage for district attorneys. Their child’s killers took plea deals to avoid a capital punishment trial. As part of those offers, they consented to help authorities look for Tim’s body, which they had actually buried in the woods. (They were not successful; Tim has actually not yet been found.).
If You Worth This Service, Please Donate Today.

” That’s when we got thinking about what impact hanging over somebody’s head the danger of a death sentence– how it can help victims find out exactly what happened,” Mike Moreau stated.
The Moreaus have also shepherded other parents of killed children through the justice system and they have actually seen people with life sentences get out of jail. Prior to they ‘d vote to end the death penalty, they stated they wish to make sure the justice system doesn’t neglect victims.
We likewise talk with Kelly Davis, an independent reporter who focuses on criminal justice problems. She strolls us through a few of the other policy implications of both death penalty tally procedures.
To end on a lighter note, we also talked about our preferred things from the week.
Libby enjoyed the numerous Vine videos individuals reposted after the video-sharing service announced it would discontinue its cellphone app, effectively ending the service. Particular favorites include this and this.
I enjoyed Saturday Night Live’s “Black Jeopardy” act because it highlighted the similarities in between black and white working class Americans– their shared “disempowerment, suspicion of authority, and working-class identity,” as Jamelle Bouie at Slate put it– without papering over basic disputes that still divide us.

This article connects to: 2016 Elections, Should Reads, Politics, San Diego Chooses.

Partner Voices.

What We Discovered Today

On the most recent episode of our elections podcast, which will drop tomorrow, Ry Rivard and I take on a grim subject: the death sentence.
2 of the folks we spoke with for the episode have a familiarity with the concern that no one ever wishes to have. Mike and Penny Moreau’s boy Tim was killed in Oregon in 1990. They began the program to talk with us about wrestling with their decision on how to vote on Propositions 62 and 66, the 2 statewide procedures that resolve the capital punishment.
It’s a really delicate subject, naturally. It’s tough– even for people who ask questions for a living– to ask questions about the death of a beloved kid. But at the end of our conversation, Penny stated something that made me feel like she was giving me permission to unclench and breathe out:
” You understand among the fears that parents of killed kids have is that their kid will be forgotten. And even though this relates to the proposals, it allows us to inform our story again, and we actually do appreciate that.”
If You Value This Service, Please Donate Today

See, this week has been heavy for me. On Monday early morning, my fantastic 92-year old granny died. Therefore did my college pal Mike, who I worked together with at the Daily Trojan at USC.
My very first instinct was to bury that sorrow and attempt to sidetrack myself with work. Which is why I wound up doing things like this cool Facebook video with Andy Keatts, where I ask him about his SANDAG examination though my face is streaked with tears from sobbing all the time.
However much more efficient than diversion has been doing the opposite– sharing stories about my granny with my household and with friends who’ve inquired about her, and recollecting about Mike with that core group of pals from our college paper.
Sorry if you discover this crude, but a specific memory of driving with a buddy to a seedy adult bookstore in Hollywood to buy a joke birthday present for Mike– an, ahem, adult movie on VHS tastefully called “Tit-anic”– has actually been making me laugh through my sadness all week. He LIKED it.
And this New york city Times story sharing Patton Oswalt’s reflections on sorrow in the wake of his other half’s death was, obviously, particularly appropriate. In it, he swears to end up the true crime book she ‘d been extensively working on up until her death.
It was yet another tip that though deaths are inescapable– often one after the other– stories, guy, they live permanently.
What VOSD Learned Today
In a major investigation today, Andrew Keatts exposed that TransNet, the sales tax hike voters approved several years ago to pay for transport jobs, is on track to generate billions less than SANDAG stated it would. That could have big ramifications for Step A, a separate sales tax trek that would money separate transport jobs. SANDAG is informing voters Procedure A will generate $18 billion– but for that to occur, San Diegans would have to spend money like they have actually never ever even come close to costs before.
♦ ♦ ♦.
The District 9 City board race is one of the few competitive contests happening in the city. This week, Ry Rivard took a look at the two prospects’ strategies to money budget-friendly housing, and he took a look at a misleading claim made against Georgette Gomez.
♦ ♦ ♦.
We did a little tour de San Diego County today, in the run-up to the election:.
Ruarri Serpa discovered that opponents of Measure T in Encinitas, which deals with real estate density, are misleading in their claims about simply how much housing the procedure would in fact bring.
Farther east, folks running for the Vallecitos Water District are aiming to keep rates so low that they’re in fact charging consumers less than the water costs to bring in.
All over the county, folks will be weighing in on school bonds. For the first time, there will be extra info on their ballots about how much the procedures may cost in the long-run. However those campaigns are still being funded by the building and construction groups most likely to take advantage of the bonds if they go through.
And in Chula Vista, the mayor is among those pushing an infrastructure measure that opponents fear might not money facilities at all.
What I read.
– This is a well-written longread about how the militia motion in the United States has gradually shifted its sights from the government to Muslims. (Kansas City Star).
– My pal Gene wrote a beautiful essay about fatherlessness and household. (NPR).
– The writer of this haunting piece shares a name with a teenager who was extremely lynched in 1916. He took a trip to the site of the lynching to unwind what took place, and how the town has processed it. (The Undefeated).
– In pop culture, there’s no such thing as a bad cops shooting. (Washington Post).
– The housing crisis in a nutshell: We’re constructing a lot of real estate– for our vehicles. (Bloomberg).
– Jennifer Frey was once one of journalism’s greatest rising stars. Then her bylines vanished. (Deadspin).
Line of the Week.
” It might be a mild deception to think of your family pet as your ‘child,’ but it’s still a deception.”– From a piece that pretty convincingly refutes calling oneself a “pet parent.”.
This post relates to: News, What We Discovered Today.

Composed by Sara Libby.
Sara Libby is VOSD’s managing editor. She manages VOSD’s newsroom and its material. You can reach her at sara.libby@voiceofsandiego.org or 619.325.0526.

Partner Voices.

Leading Stories: Oct. 22-28

These were the most popular Voice of San Diego stories for the week of Oct. 22-28.
1. The Ultimate Overview of the Regional Tally MeasuresCan’t tell Procedure E from Measure L? We have actually got you covered. (Voice of San Diego).
2. National City Grocer Applied for an Alcohol License, Then Things Got WeirdThe longtime owner of a small market in National City made an application for an authorization to sell 2 refrigerator doors’ worth of beer and wine. What took place next deals a peek into the unusual world of small-town politics and alcohol permitting drama. (Maya Srikrishnan).
3. Opinion: The Numbers Assistance the ConvadiumThe Convention Center is basically at optimal impact for its size and capability, and the San Diego market is a strong one for conventions. The convadium will perform extremely well as a convention center, plus host significant sport and home entertainment events. (Rob Hunden).
If You Worth This Service, Please Contribute Today.

4. SANDAG’s Last Tax Hike Is on Track to Fall Billions Short– and Procedure A Might TooCampaigns for and versus Procedure A are focusing on how the $18 billion it’s anticipated to raise will be spent. It turns out there are severe concerns over whether the $18 billion they’re contesting will emerge at all. (Andrew Keatts).
5. Smaller sized County Cities Could Muddy San Diego’s Plan for Pure WaterSan Diego’s recycled water project is facing roadblocks at a vital time, partially thanks to an unusual issue: the city is running short on sewage. (Ry Rivard).
6. Viewpoint: The Moral of Step B: With Enough Cash, Anybody Can Construct Anything AnywhereSan Diego voters must send out a signal that real estate belongs near existing housing and services, not in the middle of valuable farmland. (James Gordon and Mark Jackson).
7. East Village’s First Public Park Is a Petri Dish Where the Neighborhood’s Problems Have GrownEast Village is in a moment of massive shift. While the neighborhood’s rapidly gentrifying and new people and organisations are moving in, the homeless population is likewise peaking. The stress in between those 2 camps is on full public view at Fault Line Park. (Kinsee Morlan).
8. ‘California Have to Join the Remainder of the World’ Patricia Gándara, co-director of the Civil liberty Project at UCLA, rejects the framing offered by those who oppose Prop. 58, a statewide ballot procedure that would make it simpler to open multilingual education programs. High graduation rates and learning several languages are not equally special, she states. (Mario Koran).
9. With Measure A, SANDAG Is Relying on San Diegans to Invest Like They’ve Never Used BeforeFor Measure A to generate the $18 billion number that’s being promoted in mailers and in the official ballot language, the common San Diego local would need to invest more money on products based on the regional sales tax than at any time given that 1970. (Andrew Keatts).
10. Reality Check: An Investigation in Name OnlyA project mailer targeting City board prospect Georgette Gomez claims she’s “currently under examination by the Fair Political Practices Commission for failure to reveal her financial interests, as required by state law.” (Ry Rivard).
This post relates to: News.

Partner Voices.

Morning Report: Recently Blitz Versus Measure D.

The folks behind a last-minute ad blitz against Procedure D may have contravened of San Diego’s project finance law.
A political action committee for the San Diego County Taxpayers Association spent about $40,000 this week on radio advertisements opposing Step D, which would raise city hotel taxes and make it possible to construct a brand-new convention center facility that could also function as a football arena.
But the committee hasn’t disclosed that purchase through the city’s campaign financing system– which is supposed to take place within 24 Hr of any expense over $1,000 within 90 days of an election.
The treasurer for that group, April Boling, said the committee is subject to a various set of rules than the ones that need the 24-hour disclosure.
If You Value This Service, Please Contribute Today

The ad splurge seems to have been a last-minute choice to rally opposition to the procedure because there was no committee set up to handle this sort of buy.
The executive director of the city’s principles commission, speaking generally, said all expenditures on city measures need to be filed with the city.
Podcast: Convadium -> > Innovadium -> > Turducken
On today’s podcast, Andrew Keatts and I came to grips with the news that the Chargers’ vision for a convadium downtown now includes ” the region’s very first diversity-focused start-up incubator and accelerator.”
We may or may not have developed other creative things the team and mayor may take into Step C in the last 10 days of this goofy election cycle. We talked about Keatts’ boffo story today about how far behind its forecasts SANDAG is on collections from a previous tax increase and exactly what that suggests for the new one proposed in Procedure A.
We likewise invited Mason Herron to the show. He broke down exactly what we understand about early voting so far. Generally more Democrats AND more Republicans are voting early.
– Lawrence Herzog, who teaches city planning at San Diego State, weighed in, not favorably, on the question of whether football stadiums help with flourishing downtowns.
– With a number of smaller sized contributions and one $750,000 contribution, the Chargers have now spent $7.5 million on the project for Procedure C. Challengers have actually raised $124,000.
National City Chamber Excuses Its Function in Alcohol Permitting Drama
A couple of days ago, we discussed an unusual drama in National City over a female who implicated a city councilman there of hinting that she may need to support his project with a donation if she wanted an alcohol permit for her small company. The city’s staff supported her application however she did not get approval from the City Council. The Chamber of Commerce there is now excusing its role in enhancing her concerns.
The Issue with ‘Tactical Urbanism’
There’s a trend in urban planning called “tactical urbanism” or “imaginative placemaking” where neighborhood members make little changes and improvements to a space. Generally the modifications are made rapidly– like in a weekend– and take place outside the typical city allowing process. It might be anything from painting a crosswalk to fixing up an abandoned lot with benches and tables.
We blogged about one such effort last year that went awry. A group of realtors tried to make some improvements to a block on Logan Avenue in Barrio Logan. But community members there challenged the idea of outsiders parachuting in to reveal locals how to enhance.
The Washington Post revisited our story on Friday as part of an effort to understand whether tactical urbanism has a race problem:

” This spirited flurry of ‘city hacking’ has actually opened the cover on the wonky discipline of metropolitan planning and is starting to change the material of individuals’s daily lives.
But because many cities also compete with stark inequality, it’s worth asking who these repairs are meant for and how this new spirit of engaged urban citizenship can benefit everyone.”

Sacramento Report: Citizen Registration Bonanza
After a dismal turnout in the 2014 election, the state Legislature’s passed no fewer than 16 expenses focused on increasing citizen registration and turnout, including a number of bills from San Diego’s delegation, Kelly Davis reports in this week’s Sacramento Report. Davis reports back from Assemblywoman Shirley Weber’s city center on boosting voter turnout in underserved locations.
U-T Editor: Endorse, Simply Do not Support
The Union-Tribune endorsed Mara Elliott for city attorney. It’s the most significant race in San Diego right now, though it hasn’t seemed to record the public’s attention.
The endorsement, however, made me consider something else. A few days back, Union-Tribune Editor Jeff Light scolded press reporters who donate to political projects. A current story by the Center for Public Stability highlighted numerous small donations from reporters throughout the country to presidential prospects, though none from those who in fact cover the presidential race.
The U-T’s reader’s representative called Light and me to obtain remark.
” Getting at the fact turns out to be a tough job. It takes training, experience and self-control. Above all, it takes an outright devotion to impartiality. Publicly participating in political advocacy undermines that completely,” Light said.
However, there Light was, mentioned as part of the group that chose to back Elliott. An emphatic endorsement in a significant newspaper appears like it deserves a lot more to a project than a small monetary donation. I’m uncertain how Light doing that is consistent with his persistence that journalists need to have an outright devotion to impartiality in elections.
U-T Ownership Drama Continues
It appears a deal was all in place the other night for large news corporation, Gannett, to buy tronc, the company that owns the L.A. Times, Union-Tribune and numerous other major papers. However then, suddenly, the lenders financing the offer backed out.
” It’s just a damaged offer. The cash guys don’t grab the Kleenex, they open Excel. Damaged offers suggest one thing: opportunity. That’s why, as early as Thursday afternoon, brand-new buying situations moved into the preparation phases, among which we can currently see, and detail, the outlines,” writes Ken Physician, who has actually owned this story up until now.
He lays out an interesting possible situation: One result may lead to the L.A. Times ending up in the hands of L.A. billionaire Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, who might likewise acquire the U-T considering that they are now so closely lined up.
The Week’s Leading Stories
These were the 5 most popular Voice of San Diego stories for the week of Oct. 22-28. Click here to see the complete leading 10.
1. The Ultimate Guide to the Regional Ballot MeasuresCan’t tell Step E from Procedure L? We have actually got you covered. (Voice of San Diego).
2. National City Grocer Applied for an Alcohol Authorization, Then Things Got WeirdThe longtime owner of a small market in National City requested a permit to offer 2 refrigerator doors’ worth of beer and wine. What happened next deals a peek into the weird world of small-town politics and alcohol permitting drama. (Maya Srikrishnan).
3. Viewpoint: The Numbers Support the ConvadiumThe Convention Center is essentially at optimal effect for its size and capacity, and the San Diego market is a strong one for conventions. The convadium will carry out extremely well as a convention center, plus host major sport and entertainment events. (Rob Hunden).
4. SANDAG’s Last Tax Hike Is on Track to Fall Billions Short– and Measure A Might TooCampaigns for and versus Procedure A are concentrating on how the $18 billion it’s expected to raise will be invested. It ends up there are severe concerns over whether the $18 billion they’re fighting over will emerge at all. (Andrew Keatts).
5. Smaller sized County Cities Might Muddy San Diego’s Prepare for Pure WaterSan Diego’s recycled water job is facing roadblocks at an essential time, partially thanks to an unusual problem: the city is running short on sewage. (Ry Rivard).
This short article connects to: News, Early morning Report.

Written by Scott Lewis.
I’m Scott Lewis, the editor in chief of Voice of San Diego. Please contact me if you ‘d like at scott.lewis@voiceofsandiego.org or 619.325.0527 and follow me on Twitter (it’s a blast!): @vosdscott.

Partner Voices.

Sacramento Report: Ballot Is a Two-Way Street

In 2014, California strengthened its credibility as the nation’s slacker state with an embarrassingly low voter turnout: Only 25 percent of registered voters cast a tally in the June primary, and 42 percent in the November basic election. Consider qualified citizens not signed up to vote and the numbers are even bleaker: Less than a 3rd of folks qualified to enact November 2014 really did.
Ever since, the state Legislature’s passed no less than 16 bills targeted at improving voter registration and turnout, consisting of a number of bills from San Diego’s delegation.
– Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s AB 1461, signed into law in October 2015, immediately signs up qualified citizens when they get, or restore, their driver’s license or state ID.
– Sen. Ben Hueso’s SB 415, also signed into law in 2015, looks for to deal with low turnout in unique elections by requiring cities to consolidate off-cycle elections with statewide elections.
If You Worth This Service, Please Contribute Today

– Signed into law this year, Gonzalez’s AB 1921 broadens the list of who can drop off another person’s mail ballot at the registrar of voters– previously it was restricted to a close family member (e.g., moms and dad, partner, kid) or someone who resided with the citizen.
– Likewise signed into law this year was AB 2466, Assemblywoman Shirley Weber’s bill that clears up confusion over whether people on probation or secured in county prison can vote (they can). Only state prison inmates, or people under parole guidance, are disallowed from ballot.
– A costs by Gonzalez, presented previously this year, would have offered 16- and 17-year olds the right to vote in school board elections, however it stopped working in committee.
So, California’s got all these new voting-focused laws making easier to register and easier to vote. The big question is: Exactly what has to take place to boost actual voter participation?
Wednesday evening, Weber, who chairs the Assembly’s Elections and Redistricting Committee and whose district includes neighborhoods with traditionally low levels of voter turnout, held an informative hearing in San Diego to try to respond to that concern. Gonzalez joined her.
” California’s setting the gold standard compared with other states” in terms of passing laws aimed at enhancing voter involvement, stated James Schwab, chief of legal affairs for the Secretary of State’s workplace. But, he included, “California consistently has one of the lowest voter turnouts in the U.S.”
A great deal of what was discussed at the hearing is obvious: Voting is a learned habits. And ballot begets voter engagement: project outreach efforts, ballot and mailers target likely voters, while folks who rarely or never ever vote get trapped in a “vicious circle” of being overlooked, said UC San Diego government teacher Thad Kousser.
Kousser talked about a research study he had actually carried out with UCSD professor Seth Hill. Dealing with California Common Cause, they sent out non-partisan letters to 150,000 of the roughly 4 million Californians who enact basic elections but skip primaries– a group often disregarded by projects, Kousser said.
They discovered that sending one letter increased turnout by 5.4 percent, which Kousser considers substantial.
” Direct outreach does have an effect,” he stated. “Invitations do matter.”
That raised the question of whose responsibility it is to expand get-out-the-vote efforts. Christopher Rice-Wilson, associate director of Alliance San Diego, discussed his company’s effort in 2014 to run advertisements in trolleys and buses with the message “Choose San Diego” and the election date. The Metropolitan Transit System chose not to run the advertisements, stating they just accepted ads for business services.
Rice-Wilson pointed to the advertisements for Mexican elections that run on English-language radio stations in San Diego. “However we never ever hear PSAs on English radio discussing our election,” he said.
Weber informed participants she valued the input, however closed with a tip that voting is a two-way street.
” I get annoyed since our community’s disregarded,” she said. “Why? Since we do not show up. Keep in mind there’s an entire population who would like you not to vote.”
— Kelly Davis
Dems Have Supermajority in Sight
Trump might help California Republicans lose their one trump card– their ability to obstruct Dems from getting a supermajority in the Legislature.
Right now, Republicans “have is enough seats to obstruct Democrats from a two-thirds majority– suggesting that Democrats can’t raise taxes or pass certain type of expenses without some bipartisan support,” composes CalMatters.
However Democrats believe they can profit from dislike for Donald Trump at the top of the ticket and make the essential gains that would allow a supermajority.
The L.A. Times’ John Myers, however, does not believe all that much will alter if the Dems get a supermajority: “In truth, it’s most likely more bragging rights than brawn.”
Data master Paul Mitchell has some excellent breakdowns on the votes that have been returned up until now.
Golden State News
– A Barrio Logan activist is angry with state Sen. Ben Hueso for using the Chicano Park catastrophe to campaign for Measure A. (CityBeat).
– Last weekend the Los Angeles Times exposed that the Pentagon was attempting to force California National Guard soldiers who had actually deployed to Iraq to repay enlistment benefits they were given up error. The Pentagon reversed itself after the story unleashed a furor. The Times also talked with one soldier who details the toll the payments have actually handled him and his family.
– This op-ed argues that much of the state and local steps on your ballot belong to the tradition of California’s Proposition 13, which made it harder for legislators to raise taxes. (Wall Street Journal).
– Supporters of legalized marijuana hope that legalization efforts in several states, consisting of California, will push the federal government to reevaluate its restriction and pressure Mexico and Latin America to do the very same. (New york city Times).
– The California Democratic Celebration and California Republican Party have been throwing shade at each other on Twitter this week, and it’s pretty entertaining.
This post connects to: Government, Should Reads, Sacramento Report, State Government.

Partner Voices.

National City Chamber Apologizes for Role in Alcohol Authorization Drama

The National City Chamber of Commerce has apologized for getting blended in accusations against National City Councilman Jerry Cano.
While waiting to see if her alcohol authorization would be authorized, the owner of a little market implicated Cano in a letter of informing her that the owners of a liquor shop throughout the street who opposed her permit had actually contributed to his project. The implication was that if the woman similarly contributed to Cano’s campaign, the woman’s permit may be approved.
Cano rejected the claims in a letter from his lawyer threatening a libel claim to the marketplace owner, Susana Maza, and to the National City Chamber of Commerce, which had actually advocated on Maza’s behalf.
His legal representative also denied the accusations to VOSD in an email.
If You Worth This Service, Please Donate Today

” Mr. Cano never solicited any contribution, financial payment or other exchange of value in return for his assistance,” wrote Victor Torres, Cano’s lawyer.
At public hearings, representatives from the chamber spoke in favor of a permit for Maza’s market, Gama Produce, which was ultimately denied. The letter from Cano’s lawyer also said that the chamber’s CEO, Jacqueline Reynoso, had transmitted the accusation from an official chamber e-mail account.
The chamber sent out Cano and his legal representative an apology letter for getting associated with the matter.
” Ms. Reynoso was simply acting under the strict belief of helping a chamber member in positioning with the National City Chamber of Commerce’s mission as she would have generally helped other chamber member,” reads the letter. “Ms. Reynoso did not show malice or with any ulterior motive. Ms. Reynoso extends an apology to your customer for her actions and participation concerning this matter.”
The letter also stated Reynoso would refrain from getting involved with anything linked to Maza’s letter progressing.
The chamber’s lawyer declined to talk about the apology letter and the continuous problem.
Maza has actually not reacted to the letter.
Torres said in an email that he presumes “Ms. Maza is allied with folks who sympathize with and support Mr. Cano’s political opponent in this election.” He stated he discovers the fact that there were 2 letters provided on the very same subject suspicious. That agents of the Chamber of Commerce read the letters and allegations at public hearings and assisted distribute them “smells really bad.”
Maza rejected that allegation.
” I have no motivation to injure him,” she said in Spanish.
Torres stated he was thankful to see the apology letter from the chamber, but he is continuing to examine Maza and the chamber in relation to the event. He isn’t worried about how the allegations will affect Cano’s re-election campaign.
” I do not believe the campaign has actually been affected one lick,” he stated.
This short article connects to: Politics, South Bay

Partner Voices

Few Growing Downtowns Consist of an Arena– for Great Reason

By Lawrence A. Herzog|7 hours earlier
In this season of electoral politics, facts sometimes disappear behind the rosy scenarios stimulated by well-funded advertising projects and their experts.
So, let’s take a more detailed look at a couple of realities surrounding Measure C, the downtown football convadium initiative, sponsored by the San Diego Chargers and their owners, the Spanos family.
How this effort came to East Town is hardly an example of natural downtown redevelopment planning through normal public policy channels. Rather, it’s the story of a sports group looking for the very best offer, and when that offer cannot emerge, leaping back to their last hope, the East Village site.
In 2015, the Chargers revealed they would move to Los Angeles to share or occupy a brand-new arena in Carson. When the NFL owners voted instead to support a completing Rams arena in Inglewood, the Chargers were all of a sudden back in San Diego, mulling their alternatives. After toying once again with Objective Valley, the Chargers decided their finest option may be East Town.
If You Value This Service, Please Donate Today

Meanwhile, East Town has actually become the new rock star district in downtown, with a growing list of innovative jobs being generated by local education centers, the new library and the blossoming CONCEPT District, an urban effort that sets out to create brand-new developments that will attract countless design and tech tasks to the community.
East Village is quickly blossoming into a dynamic area for homeowners and workers who wish to live and produce in a street-friendly, walkable, sustainable 21st century village-like community.
A football arena is totally from sync with that situation.
However not everybody concurs.
In April, Chargers advisor Fred Maas showed up at a downtown breakfast forum on the future of East Village. Speaking ahead of Maas at that event was developer David Malmuth, who has worked with the Walt Disney Company, and is a development partner for the CONCEPT District.
Malmuth’s slideshow and lecture highlighted the neighborhood’s vision of arts and innovation, mixed-use residential, workplace and industrial development– a plan whose street-smart scale precluded a space-eating football stadium.
This was not music to Maas’ ears. When introduced, Maas bounded over to the podium and candidly mentioned that Malmuth’s ideas would be “sending the Chargers back to Los Angeles.” “The possibility of bringing some creative, airy-fairy, consultant-based, planner-based plan to those blocks is difficult,” he said.
But Maas’ statement does not hold up under examination. Nationally, inning accordance with U.S. Department of Commerce data, export sales from cultural markets (Maas’ “airy fairy” activities) totaled up to $45 billion back in 2010. The very same source shows that the creative economy in U.S. cities (artists, film, culture, music, radio, TELEVISION and its connected markets) employs about 27 million individuals and contributes some $4 trillion per year to our nation’s GNP, or 18 percent of the United States economy.
The exhausted argument that sports arenas are good for a downtown’s economy has actually been challenged by a majority of nationwide professionals. One of the leading voices, Roger Noll, a Stanford University economist, has composed that “public funding of expert sports stadiums is not an excellent civic economic financial investment.”
More to the point, downtown and the East Town are both doing fine without a football arena. A current UCSDS Extension/Downtown Collaboration study of downtown San Diego statistically explained the boom in the “development economy” tasks and activities in downtown. Over 35,000 citizens now live there, with double that number forecasted over the coming decades. And over 85,000 jobs are located in downtown, consisting of a concentration of state-of-the-art start-ups, co-working areas and other understanding economy employment.
But Maas doesn’t appear to want to let such truths and trends get in his method. In a current VOSD commentary, Maas blogged about the “region’s long existing strategies” for the conclusion of a “long planned and awaited sports and home entertainment district downtown.”
Actually? Maybe those plans exist in Maas’ bubble of truth, however an examination of the actual city plans at three scales (regional, city, community) informs a different story.
Nowhere in the San Diego Association of Government’s 2015 regional plan exists any mention of a football arena or sports/entertainment district in downtown San Diego. Indeed, SANDAG’S local strategy requires developing a smarter downtown, by making it a largely inhabited employment center, with more real estate and combined uses.
The primary downtown planning company for the city of San Diego is Civic San Diego. Its downtown community strategy specifies that East Town is “envisioned as a prospering property and combined usage community.” Its Centre City Green Downtown Sustainability Strategy argues for retrofitting downtown streets for people, not automobiles, making it more pedestrian- and bike-friendly. And Civic’s Economic and Community Advancement Strategy pictures the goals of downtown/East Village around budget-friendly housing, mixed-use tasks, small business and healthy communities. There is no mention of a convadium or a sports and entertainment district in any of these strategies.
And, naturally, the East Town south focus strategy, the only current community intend on the books, declines the concept of a football arena outright.
Few downtowns throughout the United States have football arenas, for a great reason. Their footprints are too big for the tight, street-friendly, pedestrian scale, high density live-work environments that are being produced there, in locations like Portland and Seattle. East Village is yet another example of this type of forward-thinking city future.
On Nov. 8, San Diegans would do well to look past the marketing slogans and consider whether a football arena truly belongs in a 21st century downtown neighborhood like East Village.
Lawrence A. Herzog teaches city preparation in SDSU’s School of Public Affairs. He has actually composed or modified 10 books on cities, sustainability and urban design, including his latest, “International Suburban areas: Urban spread from the Rio Grande to Rio de Janeiro.” He serves on the board of directors of C-3, Person’s Coordinate for Century 3, and has been a specialist to local, nationwide and worldwide preparation customers.
This post associates with: Viewpoint, 2016 Elections, Chargers Stadium

Written by Opinion
Op-eds and Letters to the Editor on the problems that matter in San Diego. Have something to state? Send a commentary.

Partner Voices